Author Archive for Jon

Eccleston Breaks His Silence

We know this is old news. We only got around to tidying it up and posting it. C’est la vie!

So Christopher Eccleston has finally come out – sort of – with a statement of his reasons for leaving Doctor Who. Well, he did put out a brief statement at the time but it was a bit waffly and, dare we say it, a little on the polite side.

With his latest outpouring on Bad Wilf though it appears that, unsurprisingly, the decision was all about to politics and disagreements with the senior team. We all know what senior team means though, right? Wink, wink.

Have a read of what he says and then we’ll go through and let you know what we think.

I left Doctor Who because I could not get along with the senior people. I left because of politics. I did not see eye-to-eye with them. I didn’t agree with the way things were being run. I didn’t like the culture that had grown up, around the series. So I left, I felt, over a principle.

I thought to remain, which would have made me a lot of money and given me huge visibility, the price I would have had to pay was to eat a lot of shit. I’m not being funny about that. I didn’t want to do that and it comes to the art of it, in a way. I feel that if you run your career and– we are vulnerable as actors and we are constantly humiliating ourselves auditioning. But if you allow that to go on, on a grand scale you will lose whatever it is about you and it will be present in your work.

If you allow your desire to be successful and visible and financially secure – if you allow that to make you throw shades on your parents, on your upbringing, then you’re knackered. You’ve got to keep something back, for yourself, because it’ll be present in your work. A purity or an idealism is essential or you’ll become– you’ve got to have standards, no matter how hard work that is. So it makes it a hard road, really.

You know, it’s easy to find a job when you’ve got no morals, you’ve got nothing to be compromised, you can go, ‘Yeah, yeah. That doesn’t matter. That director can bully that prop man and I won’t say anything about it’. But then when that director comes to you and says ‘I think you should play it like this’ you’ve surely got to go ‘How can I respect you, when you behave like that?’

So, that’s why I left. My face didn’t fit and I’m sure they were glad to see the back of me. The important thing is that I succeeded. It was a great part. I loved playing him. I loved connecting with that audience. Because I’ve always acted for adults and then suddenly you’re acting for children, who are far more tasteful; they will not be bullshitted. It’s either good, or it’s bad. They don’t schmooze at after-show parties, with cocktails.

Pretty frank, huh?

Clearly Eccleston, as an actor of some great repute, felt that the process of making Doctor Who and the personalities involved made his job as an actor, less than fulfilling.

It’s telling that the actor that replaced him – David Tennant, lest we forget – was a virtual unknown at the time but, and this is important, had worked with Russell T Davies previously, in the execrable Casanova.

So his status as a willing malleable puppet was assured.

Eccleston – an established actor – would have required from the role a degree of freedom, the ability to shape the Doctor as he saw fit. As a good actor, this is to be expected. Watch any of Christopher Walken’s performances to see just how effective a policy that can be.

However it’s doubtful that Russell T Davies and his team of highly skilled supplicants would have wanted anything to detract from his grand vision of a regenerated Doctor.

Eccleston’s desire to inhabit the role and actually be an actor would have been very much at odds with the one-dimensional, Davies lead, Doctor that we saw Tennant become. For Eccleston’s Doctor there was to be no gurning, brainy specs, over-acting reaction shots or cries of allons-y.

Eccleston’s take on the Doctor focussed on the other-worldly aspects of the character and had little truck with sexual politics or fart gags, and it is probably his resistance to the many, many ideas and ilconceived notions that Davies and his team were foisting upon the character that saw him leave.

The Impossible Astronaut

So it airs tomorrow here in the UK. That means that between 18:00 and 18:45 on Saturday, 23rd April we’ll be tweeting like maniacs.

It looks like it’s going to be pretty special too, with the first location filming for Doctor Who since City Of Death back in 1979! We’ll gloss over the Canadian shot TV movie…

So what do we know – or think we know – about The Impossible Astronaut so far then?

Season 6 - The gang's all here.

Season 6 - The gang's all here.

Well lets see…

  • The Silence feature
  • A lead character will die within the first 10 minutes
  • We find out that River Song is from Earth
  • The Silence might be related to the Cybermen
  • The Stetson wearing Doctor in the trailer is from the future
  • It’s a two-parter

So we don’t know much then really. Oh well, our opinion will be posted here shortly after…

Elisabeth Sladen 1946 – 2011

Sarah Jane Smith and the eleventh Doctor

Sarah Jane Smith and the eleventh Doctor

Sarah Jane Smith was a companion without compare, following Jo Grant’s departure to marry a long haired hippy in The Green Death, she joined the third Doctor on his adventures in the 1973 serial The Time Warrior and then – post regeneration – the fourth Doctor, before finally parting company in 1976′s The Hand of Fear.

During that time she met Sontarans, Daleks, Cybermen, even Davros himself.

Although only in the show – initially at least – for three years, she became popular with the fans and it is this popularity that lead to her later appearances.

She first returned to the role in a pilot for K-9 And Company which although unsuccessful at the time would be reborn decades later in a much more successful format.

Her proper return to Doctor Who though, took place in 1983′s The Five Doctors, where she joined a number of other companions and the first five Doctors in playing the deadly Game Of Rassilon.

This wasn’t the end for Sarah Jane Smith though, it would be a while before she would return again to the role of Sarah Jane Smith but when she did it was explosive.

Riding high on the success of his rejuvenation of Doctor Who and its popularity with a new generation of kids, Russell T Davies brought back Sarah Jane – still an investigative journalist – in the tenth Doctor’s 2006 adventure School Reunion. It was this reintroduction of Sarah Jane that lead to the best kid’s science fiction show ever; The Sarah Jane Adventures.

Elisabeth Sladen played Sarah Jane with conviction and sincerity, without her the character wouldn’t have been as strong and believable. She will be greatly missed.

Doomsday: Void Material

This is intended to be the first in a number of posts about the disastrous climax of series two of the rejuvenated Doctor Who, the episode in question – Doomsday – contains what is possibly the worst dialogue ever broadcast.

Not only that but some of the ideas it contains, and the implementation of those ideas, are beyond ridicule. Enough of all this spiel, let’s get on with the curious case of Void material…

In Doomsday we discover that anyone that’s been in the Void gets covered in Void Material. The longer you’re in, the more gets stuck to you. Simple. How do you detect if you have any of this Void material on you though?

The Doctor in 3D glasses

Gosh, isn't he so whacky and out there!

Well the only way to detect Void material is by the use of a complex series of detectors that unravel all the tightly knotted dimensions of space that surround the target and count the number of positive hits from the particles of Void material as they struggle to return to their own dimension.

Either that or just put on a pair of cheap 3D glasses.

This is yet another example of Davies’ piss-poor writing for Doctor Who and his lack of imagination. He just goes for a very cheap and unsatisfying gimmick that runs the length of the show until the disappointing reveal at the end.

It’s as if we’re supposed to sit there watching the Doctor running about in 3D specs and think that it’s just The Doctor being all whacky and out-there.
Continue reading ‘Doomsday: Void Material’

Have The Daleks Had Their Day?

Having just sat down and watched the eleventh Doctor in Victory of the Daleks it occurred to us that the Daleks have been in Doctor Who almost as long as the Doctor himself, appearing as they did in the first Doctor’s, second serial.

Which, coincidentally, as if to prove the lack of recognition given to Doctor Who by the BBC, has gone by at least three different names. Originally the serial was called The Mutants, then it was briefly known as The Dead Planet, before finally coming to be known as The Daleks. It makes sense that the BBC would want it known as The Daleks given their cash cow status.

This underlines the way the Daleks have come to be used, an entire serial can have its name changed to highlight their part in it. Forget the plot, forget The Doctor, forget anything to do with exciting storytelling, no, just slap the word Dalek in the title and the kids will come running.

Nowhere has this tired use of IP been more obvious than in the revived Doctor Who, I had hoped that Moffat would have moved away from the crass recycling of the Daleks perpetrated by Davies before him. Sadly, like Christopher Eccleston and David Tennant before him, it didn’t take Matt Smith’s Doctor long to meet the Daleks.

Albeit in a toy friendly range of colours. Ahem.

When are we going to see some original new creatures? Something with a bit of genuine menace would be nice, please.

We’re Still Here

It’s been a while since we’ve posted anything but that’s mainly to do with our enchantment by Matt Smith’s portrayl of the Doctor.

Yes, you heard us right.

We love Matt Smith as the Doctor. He’s the best Doctor since Tom Baker. Really, we’re honest.

Of course that’s not to say we don’t think that Doctor Who has a lot of work to do to get to the standard that we’re hoping for, oh no.

Matt Smith may be a phenomenon and we’re going to tell you exactly why, sadly we’re going to tell you exactly why we think the show is still dreadful…

Stay tuned for that, it’s coming soon. We promise.

A New Era Has Begun!

We’ll all have seen The Eleventh Hour by now right? Well we’re working on our review but in the meantime we’d like to hear your views on it and the new cast.

Come on start talking!

So The Eleventh Hour then, what did you think?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

What did you think of Matt Smith as The Doctor?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

What did you think of Karen Gillan as Amy Pond?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thanks people!

Oh God No, Not Again

Karen Gillan: lover of anagrams.

Karen Gillan: lover of anagrams.

Here we are again, the start of the end.

It would appear that the new Doctor Who production team loves anagrams as much as Russell T Davies.

Shit.

BUt we here you ask, how do we know this information? From whence did the revelation come?

Well, blame The Guardian – which it seems is the hot place for Doctor Who info these days – they’ve got an interview with Karen Gillan and in it she describes the audition process and her recall, which is where the anagram nonsense comes to light.

Young Ms Gillan comes clean and reveals just how auditioning for Doctor Who works.

Then I got the recall, the second audition. That was when I started sweating. This huge thing. And it was so secretive I couldn’t even tell BBC reception where I was going, had to pretend it was for something called Panic Moon, which is an anagram of companion.

Panic Moon? Jesus.

Let’s hope it’s just for the audition process and they abandon it in the show, huh?

Still at least a bit of hope comes from the fact that young Gillan admits that she’s not a huge follower of Doctor Who. This can only be a good thing after all who wants her trying to be all cow-eyed like Billie Piper or dim and shouty like Catherine Tate?

There Once Was Hope…

In view of the relaunch of Doctor Who – with the wonderful Matt Smith – we thought it was about time that we discussed some of the moments that excited us during Russell T Davies tenure at the helm.

As odd as it sounds – coming from us at least – there were a few incidents that reminded us of classic Who and offered a glimmer of hope that things might have gotten better.

They were few and far between but it’s only fair that we list them. This shouldn’t take too long… Continue reading ‘There Once Was Hope…’

Theme Tune Showdown!

The theme tune to Doctor Who is iconic, of that there’s no mistaking. It’s right up there with The Sweeney, The Professionals and The Casualty in terms of instantly recognisable television themes.

We all know that Ron Grainer was the composer of the theme tune for Doctor Who and we also know that it’s gone through many different arrangements in the 47 years it’s been around.

The first was by a fantastically talented young lady called Delia Derbyshire. When we say talented, we mean it. She was so far ahead of her time that it’s scary. She took Ron’s composition and went to town on it.

There’s a school of thought that says young Delia – only 26 at the time – really made the Doctor Who theme memorable by her painstaking splicing of audio tape to realise Ron Grainer’s vision of the theme. In fact she put so much of herself into it that Ron questioned whether or not he’d even written it!

Skipping ahead 42 years and we have the Murray Gold arrangement. Strange that it should be called an arrangement given that it heavily samples the original Delia Derbyshire piece.

Gold’s arrangement seems to almost entirely consist of the addition of a militaristic drumbeat which in itself is rather odd given The Doctor’s dislike of all things militaristic. Still I’m sure Russell T Davies approved of it wholeheartedly… We digress. The whole point of this post is to get a handle on the preferences of our brave readers.

Which is better Murray Gold’s new version of the theme or Delia Derbyshire’s original? Sadly we don’t have Harry Hill’s uncanny knack of arranging fights between two opposing options, so we’ve had to go for a poll instead.

Before you answer said poll though, here’s a reminder of the two themes. First, the original version:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

And next the new and improved version:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

So then, which is the best theme?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

We hope you voted wisely.