<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Can Write This Shit Russell, But You Can&#8217;t Say It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doctorwhoisdire.com/2010/01/02/you-can-write-this-shit-russell-but-you-cant-say-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doctorwhoisdire.com/2010/01/02/you-can-write-this-shit-russell-but-you-cant-say-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorwhoisdire.com/2010/01/02/you-can-write-this-shit-russell-but-you-cant-say-it/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorwhoisdire.com/?p=140#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Spot on that lady!

Fancy writing for us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on that lady!</p>
<p>Fancy writing for us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://www.doctorwhoisdire.com/2010/01/02/you-can-write-this-shit-russell-but-you-cant-say-it/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorwhoisdire.com/?p=140#comment-136</guid>
		<description>The whole re-imagining of Doctor Who is quite pathetic. Gone are the days when you could be sure of tuning in and NOT seeing the Doctor ogle everything in/out of a skirt. One of the givens about Dr. Who is that he would not be canoodling Rose or Sarah Jane. He might be fond of them, in the way that you can be fond of a pet rat, but he would never approach them as a traditional male might do. You knew where you were with Doctor Who. Now, if you&#039;re a doctor babe, you can bet you&#039;ll either be deeply in love with the guy with two hearts or walk off with a version of him. Or treat him like your dim younger brother.

I disliked Tennant&#039;s Who. He seemed to be a dim younger brother on uppers. Speed freak. In between running about frantically (for what?), he was morosely considering his &#039;death&#039;. Newsflash - you cannot DIE, Doctor. He is a self-obsessed post-modernist boring pipsqueak in an unimaginative brown outfit.

Let&#039;s hope Matt Smith will be an improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole re-imagining of Doctor Who is quite pathetic. Gone are the days when you could be sure of tuning in and NOT seeing the Doctor ogle everything in/out of a skirt. One of the givens about Dr. Who is that he would not be canoodling Rose or Sarah Jane. He might be fond of them, in the way that you can be fond of a pet rat, but he would never approach them as a traditional male might do. You knew where you were with Doctor Who. Now, if you&#8217;re a doctor babe, you can bet you&#8217;ll either be deeply in love with the guy with two hearts or walk off with a version of him. Or treat him like your dim younger brother.</p>
<p>I disliked Tennant&#8217;s Who. He seemed to be a dim younger brother on uppers. Speed freak. In between running about frantically (for what?), he was morosely considering his &#8216;death&#8217;. Newsflash &#8211; you cannot DIE, Doctor. He is a self-obsessed post-modernist boring pipsqueak in an unimaginative brown outfit.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Matt Smith will be an improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
